diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index ffca1de..5af9161 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ RWKV-3 1.5B on A40 (tf32) = always 0.015 sec/token, tested using simple pytorch
 
 GPT2-XL 1.3B on A40 (tf32) = 0.032 sec/token (for ctxlen 1000), tested using HF, GPU utilization 45% too (interesting), VRAM 9655M
 
+How it works: RWKV gathers information to a number of channels, which are also decaying with different speeds as you move to the next token. It's very simple once you understand it.
+
+**RWKV is parallelizable because the time-decay of each channel is data-independent (and trainable)**. For example, in usual RNN you can adjust the time-decay of a channel from say 0.8 to 0.5 (these are called "gates"), while in RWKV you simply move the information from a W-0.8-channel to a W-0.5-channel to achieve the same effect.
+
 ## Join our Discord: https://discord.gg/bDSBUMeFpc :)
 
 You are welcome to join the RWKV discord https://discord.gg/bDSBUMeFpc to build upon it. We have plenty of potential compute (A100 40Gs) now (thanks to CoreWeave), so if you have interesting ideas I can run them. I am also looking for CUDA gurus to optimize the kernel. Thank you.
@@ -41,10 +45,6 @@ You can find me (BlinkDL) in the EleutherAI Discord too: https://www.eleuther.ai
 
 ## Quick start
 
-How it works: RWKV gathers information to a number of channels, which are also decaying with different speeds as you move to the next token. It's very simple once you understand it.
-
-**RWKV is parallelizable because the time-decay of each channel is data-independent (and trainable)**. For example, in usual RNN you can adjust the time-decay of a channel from say 0.8 to 0.5 (these are called "gates"), while in RWKV you simply move the information from a W-0.8-channel to a W-0.5-channel to achieve the same effect.
-
 ### Inference
 
 Check https://github.com/BlinkDL/RWKV-v2-RNN-Pile for L24-D1024 and L12-D768 models trained on the Pile (and the latest code). It's very fast on CPU (the default mode).